October 29, 2025
Real Estate
Investing in residential real estate demands more than chasing the highest average returns. True portfolio resilience comes from evaluating both upside and downside—volatility, carrying costs, and local dynamics that can erode gains. In San Jose, Evergreen and Silver Creek Country Club stand out as premier submarkets, each with distinct risk‑return profiles.
This article dives deep into the analytics behind those profiles—quantifying price volatility, rental yield, tax benefits, and community stability—so you can make an informed, risk‑adjusted decision. Our transparent methodology, backed by comparative data and neighborhood nuance, demonstrates why partnering with a trusted realtor elevates both safety and performance in your real‑estate portfolio.
Before diving into risk metrics, here’s a snapshot of each market’s core characteristics:
Evergreen (ZIPs 95121 & 95135)
Median Home Price: ~$1.6 M
5‑Year Appreciation: ~52% average
Average Cap Rate: 4.0% (with ADU income)
Average Days on Market: 26 days
Silver Creek Country Club (ZIP 95138)
Median Home Price: ~$3.0 M
5‑Year Appreciation: ~40% average
Average Cap Rate: 3.2% (luxury amenity premium)
Average Days on Market: 22 days
This initial comparison shows Evergreen’s lower entry point and higher cap rates, while Silver Creek commands premium pricing and slightly faster sales.
Price risk measures how much home values swing year‑over‑year. We assess volatility using standard deviation of annual median price changes:
Evergreen Volatility: ±6.5%
Silver Creek Volatility: ±5.2%
Analysis:
Evergreen’s slightly higher volatility reflects a broader buyer base and more ADU‑driven fluctuation.
Silver Creek’s gated community and HOA standards dampen swings, offering steadier price paths.
How to Apply:
Run a 10‑Year Price Chart: Plot median price annually to visualize swings.
Calculate Standard Deviation: Use Excel or your realtor’s CMA tool to quantify risk.
Set Risk Tolerance: If you prefer steadier returns, favor Silver Creek; if you accept more risk for higher yield, consider Evergreen.
A core component of risk‑adjusted returns is reliable cash flow. We compare gross rental yields:
Evergreen Yield (w/ ADU): 4.0–4.5%
Silver Creek Yield: 3.0–3.5%
Key Drivers:
ADU Income in Evergreen: Permitted ADUs average $2,800/month rent, boosting yield by ~1%.
HOA Dues in Silver Creek: $500–$1,200/month reduces net yield by 0.4–0.8%.
How to Apply:
Estimate Gross Rent: Survey similar rentals (2,500 sq ft vs. 3,300 sq ft) for base rent.
Subtract Expenses: Include HOA, insurance, property‑tax, and management fees.
Compute Net Yield: Divide net income by purchase price to compare neighborhoods.
Holding costs eat into returns. Compare annual carrying costs:
Evergreen Carrying Cost: ~1.2% of property value
Silver Creek Carrying Cost: ~1.5% of property value
Components:
Property Tax: Both ZIPs average 1.1% levy.
HOA Fees: Silver Creek’s club dues add 0.4–0.6%.
Insurance Premiums: Luxury homes incur 0.1% higher rates.
ADU Tax Exemption:
Evergreen owners who file early get a supplemental exemption, lowering assessed value by up to $70k.
How to Apply:
Tally All Costs: List property tax, HOA, insurance, utilities, and maintenance.
Model Five‑Year Carry: Project cumulative costs and compare to expected appreciation.
File Exemptions Promptly: Consult Block Change Real Estate to manage paperwork for ADU breaks.
Strong schools buffer value downturns. We evaluate district risk:
Evergreen Valley USD Improvement: Test scores have risen from 6.5 to 7.8/10 over five years.
Silver Creek Private & Public Mix: High private‑school enrollment and public scores near 8.2/10.
Demographic Trends:
Evergreen’s population growth: +3% in past two years, driven by young families.
Silver Creek’s stable base: +1% growth, skewed toward higher‑income, older demographics.
How to Apply:
Analyze Enrollment Data: Obtain district reports on student population trends.
Map School Ratings Over Time: Plot CDE scores by year to confirm stability.
Weight Demographics: If lower turnover is key, favor Silver Creek; for growth potential, consider Evergreen.
Supply constraints and buyer demand shape risk:
Evergreen Pending Ratio: 0.53 (pending ÷ active)
Silver Creek Pending Ratio: 0.48
Implications:
A higher pending ratio in Evergreen signals tighter supply, potentially driving faster price gains—but also more competition risk.
Silver Creek’s slower ratio reflects steadier, less volatile buyer activity.
How to Apply:
Track Weekly Pending: Ask your realtor for a dashboard on pending vs. active listings.
Forecast Inventory Shifts: Factor in new developments like the Ranch 99 mixed‑use in Evergreen.
Adjust Offer Strategy: In higher pending markets, plan escalation clauses and flexible contingencies.
Accessory Dwelling Units can boost returns but carry permitting risk:
Evergreen ADU Permitting Rate: 85% approval, 4–6 month timeline.
Silver Creek ADU Limits: Stricter design guidelines, 70% approval rate.
Development Projects:
Evergreen’s upcoming mixed‑use at Ranch 99 may increase competition.
Silver Creek’s clubhouse renovations could spur short‑term disruption but long‑term amenity lift.
How to Apply:
Examine Permit Data: Review city‑council records for ADU application success rates.
Assess Development Calendars: Check planning agendas for major community projects.
Incorporate Delay Buffers: If relying on ADU income, build 6–9 months of vacancy into your cash‑flow model.
Sophisticated investors model best, base, and worst cases:
Base Case: 5% annual appreciation, 4% net yield.
Bear Case: 1% appreciation, 2% net yield, 4% vacancy.
Bull Case: 7% appreciation, 5% net yield, 1% vacancy.
Comparative Outcomes (5‑Year IRR):
Evergreen Base: ~9.2% IRR
Silver Creek Base: ~7.8% IRR
Evergreen Bear: ~3.5% IRR
Silver Creek Bear: ~4.0% IRR
How to Apply:
Build a Cash‑Flow Model: Use a spreadsheet to input variables for rent, appreciation, costs, and vacancy.
Adjust Variables: Simulate rate hikes, cost overruns, or slower sales.
Evaluate IRRs: Compare internal rates of return under each scenario to see which market withstands shocks better.
Real‑estate adds diversification but markets correlate:
Correlation with Tech Cycle: Both neighborhoods track broader Bay Area trends—rising with tech booms, dipping in downturns.
Intra‑Market Correlation: Evergreen and Silver Creek values move in tandem 0.85 correlation coefficient.
Diversification Strategies: Consider adding a condo in downtown San Jose or an Almaden Hills home to reduce concentrated risk.
How to Apply:
Calculate Correlations: Use historical price series to compute correlation coefficients.
Assess Portfolio Weighting: Determine ideal exposure (e.g., 60% Evergreen, 40% Silver Creek) based on risk appetite.
Explore Additional Assets: Recommend non‑residential investments (small commercial or multifamily) for true diversification.
A risk‑adjusted investment strategy in San Jose’s top submarkets requires blending data and local insight. Evergreen offers higher cap rates and growth potential—tempered by greater volatility and ADU permitting risk—while Silver Creek provides steadier appreciation and amenity‑driven stability at a premium cost.
By quantifying price swings, rental yields, carrying costs, and development timelines, and by stress‑testing scenarios, investors can build resilient portfolios aligned with their risk tolerance. At Block Change Real Estate, our sophisticated, transparent methodology ensures you’re not just chasing returns, but managing risk—and safeguarding your capital for the long term.
Stay Updated On Our Most Recent Blog Posts
Real Estate
Brian Ng | October 29, 2025
Real Estate
Thao Dang Pham | October 28, 2025
Real Estate
Brian Ng | October 27, 2025
Real Estate
Brian Ng | October 24, 2025
Real Estate
Thao Dang Pham | October 23, 2025
Real Estate
Brian Ng | October 22, 2025
You’ve got questions and we can’t wait to answer them.